Transfer Pricing is used by multinational enterprises to establish the pricing for goods and services transferred between their related companies situated in different countries. Multinational enterprises often use Transfer Pricing as a method to allocate profits into territories where tax rates are more favourable.
However, these transactions carried out between related companies must comply with the Arm’s Length Principle. Tax authorities normally look for conformity with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guidelines on the application of the arm’s length principle for cross-border transactions between related companies. Multinational enterprises need to demonstrate that the transfer prices applied in transactions between their related companies is equivalent to prices charged by independent companies in similar economic conditions.
With related company transactions accounting for more than 60% of global trade in terms of value, multinational enterprises need to comply with both the OECD guidelines/principles on transfer pricing and the World Trade Organization (WTO) Valuation Agreement on imported product valuations.
What are the challenges?
Within multinationals, the objectives for the Corporate Tax Team and the objectives for the International Shipping Department can be contradictory and result in tensions.
The Corporate Tax Team is looking for the highest transfer price possible, as this reduces taxable profit.
The International Shipping Department is looking for the lowest Customs value possible, as this reduces duty and import tax payments.
In most cases the transfer pricing benefits will outweigh the Customs duty benefits. Nevertheless, multinationals need to ensure they remain compliant with the OECD guidelines and the WTO Valuation Agreement on import valuations.
Customs value is confirmed at point of customs clearance.
Transfer value is confirmed retrospectively.
Tax authorities and Customs authorities set rules independently concerning the value of imported products.
Subsequently, the Tax authorities and Customs authorities have different approaches.
Tax authorities are focused on Transfer Pricing between related companies that may be superficially higher than they should be.
Customs authorities are focused on imported product prices that may be superficially lower than the market price.
Customs have 6 methods for calculating the value of imported goods and OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines detail 5 transfer pricing methods that may be used to establish or test the arm’s length principle for the value of imported goods.
Customs valuation covers goods only.
Transfer Pricing covers goods, services and property.
Customs
There are 6 methods for calculating the value of imported goods where ad valorem duty applies to assess the amount of customs duty and import tax to pay (import tax is not applicable to all countries). Tariff classification and preferential origin are the other key elements necessary for establishing duty liability. The same value is often used for trade statistics.
Tax
The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines detail five transfer pricing methods that may be used to establish or test the arm’s length principle. The first three methods are frequently referred to as the traditional transactional methods whilst the latter two are referred to as the transactional profits’ methods.
Customs authorities continue to focus on the transaction value and whether the price has been influenced by the companies being related. Customs authorities will therefore examine transfer pricing data in this context and not in relation to the use of other WTO methods.
Why?
Many countries have procedures which enable Customs authorities to consider upwards and downwards adjustments to the Customs value, following a transfer pricing adjustment. The upwards adjustments could result in additional duty being owed against imported goods and this duty must be paid. The downwards adjustments could result in a refund of duty.
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) state “It is now CBP’s position that subject to certain conditions, the transaction value method of appraisement will not be precluded when a related party sales price is subject to post-importation adjustments that are made pursuant to formal transfer pricing policies and specifically related (directly or indirectly) to the declared value of the merchandise. These adjustments, whether upward or downward, are to be taken into account in determining transaction value.”
Australia Customs and Border Protection state “Where a voluntary disclosure involves transfer pricing between related parties, any adjustments to goods must be submitted as soon as the data becomes available and should be submitted in line with your financial reporting obligations. Where a voluntary disclosure results in an overpayment of customs duty, a claim for a refund can be lodged”.
HM Revenue and Customs state "Situations may arise, whereby, for a variety of reasons, the price that you pay to the seller for the imported goods is revised or re-negotiated after the entry of the goods to free circulation. When this happens you must consider the customs valuation and Customs Duty implications". However, until a Brexit agreement is in place, UK companies looking at retroactive Transfer Pricing adjustments will need to be aware of EU rules concerning transfer pricing and Customs valuations.
If you would like more details, please call +44 (0) 118 932 8447 or email info@icsglobalservices.com
Ian Simmonds